Academic Journal
Main Category: Women's Health / Gynecology
Also Included In: Ovarian Cancer; Cancer / Oncology
Article Date: 08 Dec 2011 - 18:00 PST
email to a friend 
printer friendly 
opinions 
Women who have children have lower risks of breast, ovarian, and uterine cancer compared childless (nulliparous) women, so researchers have suggested the possibility of giving them the pill to regulate their menstrual cycles and statistically improve their health, rather than for contraceptive reasons.
Dr Kara Britt, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, and Professor Roger Short, University of Melbourne, Australia, raises the issue in a comment published in The Lancet, stating that since the contraceptive pill reduces overall mortality and mortality due to ovarian and uterine cancer, Catholic nuns should be given the pill for health, rather than contraceptive reasons.
Nulliparous women have more ovulation / menstrual cycles than women who have children, due to the absence of pregnancy and lactation. The increased number of cycles is thought to increase their cancer risk. Other factors including more overall cycles, regardless of having children or not, also increase cancer risk, for example, going through puberty earlier or menopause later. Women who have children further decrease their risk of these cancers if they have their first child at a young age, bear more children, and breastfeed.
The authors point out that the risk of developing ovarian and endometrial cancers falls by 50-60% in pill users compared with never-users. A protection that is evident for 20 years, showing a clear long-term benefit.
Of course, as with any medication, the pill is not risk-free. For example, the combined oestrogen/progestogen pill can increase the risk of blood clots (venous thromboembolism), and as such the woman's medical history should always be considered.
It is also known that the pill carries an increased risk of breast cancer, especially in cases where there is a family history of the disease. The pill can also cause other issues, such as fluid retention, nausea, headaches, and there has been a recent controversy with Bayer, the maker of the Yazmin brand of later generation pills, regarding the withholding evidence of health risks from the FDA.
The authors conclude:
"The Catholic church condemns all forms of contraception, as outlined by Pope Paul VI in Humanae Vitae in 1968. Although Humanae Vitae never mentions nuns, they should be free the use the contraceptive pill to protect against the hazards of nulliparity since the document states that 'the Church in no way regards as unlawful therapeutic means considered necessary to cure organic diseases, even though they also have a contraceptive effect'.If the Catholic church could make the contraceptive pill freely available to all its nuns, it would reduce the risk of those accursed pests, cancer of the ovary and uterus, and give nuns' plight the recognition it deserves."
It's probably a little unfair to childless women and especially those of the cloth to make sweeping statements about their health, especially since many nuns live relatively humble and frugal lives, that might, in fact, decrease their risks of diseases like cancer.
It would probably require some hard data from nuns around the world to assess their cancer risks before allocating hormone pills ad lib. On the other hand, obviously the church would be wise to offer its disciples every health and scientific benefit available.
Written by Rupert Shepherd
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
21 Dec. 2011.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
posted by Rachel on 10 Dec 2011 at 10:27 am
This is, of course, a completely ridiculous idea.
The pharmaceutical industry - which now control educational content of medical schools - won't be happy until everyone in the world is on some sort of pharmaceutical drug.
Btw, a few years back, Harvard University medical students were polled as to their perception as to the quality and validity of the medical education they were being given. Want to know the overall score: D- . Want to know the #1reason why? The student felt that rather than being educated as to how to heal a person they were, rather, being educated as to how to prescribe medications. IN THEIR OPINION, this was NOT what they wanted to go to medical school to do. They wanted to be healers, not pharmaceutical reps. What a very sad commentary on our "health" care system.
| post followup | alert a moderator |
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.
No comments:
Post a Comment